On 01/08/2015 11:23 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Jonathan Billings <billings@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> If we express them >>> here then there is a chance, a small chance but a chance nonetheless, >>> that someone at RH with a view a little broader than that evidenced in >>> most of the traffic on the Fedora devel list, might take notice. >> >> I think this essentially sums up your point, and elucidates what I >> think is the error in your thinking. > > Yes, it is pretty clearly an error to think anyone else cares. Red > Hat will make some money on new training classes helping people cope > with the breakage. And CentOS will continue to be a copy with no > input. That still doesn't make it any better for the CentOS users of > things that now have an expiration date. > How log do you need to keep saying the same thing. CentOS is now what it has been for 11 years. If that is what you want, use it. If it is not what you want, use something else. You think it is so easy to do something else .. then you hire the people required and do your own distro.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
