Re: Design changes are done in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Jan 6, 2015, at 7:45 PM, John R. Dennison <jrd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 06:52:48PM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
>> 
>> I am explaining to them why this is not a productive view.
> 
> It's not relevant in _any_ sense.  CentOS is nothing more than (at it's
> core) a rebuild of RHEL.  This type of nonsense should be directed to
> Red Hat in a Red Hat venue.

I’m answering here because the messages keep coming here, and there doesn’t seem to be anyone else here willing to take up the other side of the argument.

You are, however, correct, that yelling about the problems here is unlikely to change anything.  I’ve made that point at least twice in prior messages.  Yet, the replies keep coming.

If we can’t get people to go scratch their own itches, maybe we can at least get them to stop complaining about things that cannot be changed at this level.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux