On 12/28/2014 08:52 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 10:30 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
.............. The design changes are done in Fedora, .
What type of large commercial organisation lets undisciplined people
make adverse changes detrimental to the reputation and ultimate success
of its 'stable' commercial product.
Any organization using open source. More specifically, any organization
that uses the Linux Kernel. Or have you never read the linux kernel
mailing list (LKML)? Open source by its very nature is somewhat
'undisciplined' in that any particular project's discipline (or, to use
a fifty-dollar word, 'governance') is entirely self-imposed by the
project members, and some projects have 'better' discipline/governance
than others. This is the cost of decentralized development of core
pieces of the operating system; it is an acceptable cost for my uses.
And I intentionally put 'better' in quotes because what is 'better' is
entirely subjective.
* The dramatic upheaval in C7;
Had EL7 been a straight clone of Fedora 20 it would/could have been much
worse. Try out F20 for a while to see the differences.
* The claimed life-span of C5 truncated by no more normal upgrades;
Define 'normal' upgrades. Are you talking about the 'quarterly' updates
that masquerade as 'point' releases? (Yeah, yeah, I know they're not
strictly quarterly, but go read some of the early EL literature......)
* The changes introduced in C6.6, during the lifetime of an allegedly
stable C6 product;
The Update 6 releases seem from my view to have been substantial
upheavals and opportunities to get somewhat major things pushed in. EL5
update 6 was no exception, and, as I recall, EL4 update 6 wasn't,
either, but that's been a while, so I may not be remembering it
completely; and I don't remember much of anything about the 3u5 to 3u6
transition. At least during this cycle Red Hat staggered the releases
unlike the triple-threat posed last major release cycle, where 4u10,
5u6, and 6GA all 'hit' within weeks of each other.
Red Hat is walking a tightrope here, and, honestly, I think they are
doing a fantastic job in what they do, given the fact that they are not
going to please all of their users any particular time. The users'
requirements are just too varied, and many of those requirements are
mutually exclusive. They're not going to please any one of the users
all the time, either.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
