Hello, Thanks for all feedback I got. I am pretty sure that if I used ³openssl enc² method, it is able to handle large file over 250g size perfectly. I think openssl installed on the system is capable of doing large file support. However, when using ³openssl smime², it is not able to. Apparently it¹s smime method limitations, not the openssl. Other than smime and enc, what other methods can I use for large file support that would use the asymmetric public/private keys? - xinhuan _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Asymmetric encryption for very large tar file
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Asymmetric encryption for very large tar file
- From: Xinhuan Zheng <xzheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:37:20 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AQHQG6GtxlMd3G2UfE6IjcVZ6K8/dA==
- Thread-topic: Asymmetric encryption for very large tar file
- User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.7.141117
- Prev by Date: Re: Asymmetric encryption for very large tar file
- Next by Date: Re: WARNING: No module xenblk found for kernel
- Previous by thread: Re: Asymmetric encryption for very large tar file
- Next by thread: I can't see some of my onwn e-mails ...
- Index(es):
 |