On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:32 PM, <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jeremy Hoel wrote:
> > We noticed this when installing onto some new Dell R320's.. it might have
> > something to do with hardware that the device had that the older kernel
> > might not have known about. Nothing seemed wrong and everything seemed
> to
> > install ok (we would also update the kernel in the install process, so
> > that
> > probably hid any further problems), but moving to a 6.6 install made the
> > silly error message go away.
> >
> Please don't top post.
>
> Dumb question: *how* were you installing? Did you have a kickstart of your
> very own? If so... could it have wanted eth0, and the installer called it
> em1?
>
> mark
>
>
Kickstart.. and we had already changed the interface to the new name. It's
the same kickstart between the two versions, with just the nic name being
different.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
