On 11/12/2014 07:19 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Kai Schaetzl <maillists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>>> Well, *yes*. It's not business to be carried out on the list nor does the
>>> guy who moans about it seem to know why. And if you are the second from
>>> Gmail then please move it off-list as well. It's really not anyone's
>>> problem on this list what Gmail does.
>>
>> No, it isn't just "what Gmail does." Yahoo and AOL are other major
>> handlers that do the same/similar thing (and there are other
>> not-as-major email handlers doing it too). As has happened many times
>> in the past, the "rules" for email handling have changed. The biggest
>> group of legitimate email handlers affected by this change is mailing
>> list handlers; they need to adapt or get blocked/sidelined/etc.
>>
>> Is it annoying? Yep. Is what these providers are doing a good idea?
>> That's debatable. Is it here to stay? Most likely.
>
> So in practice I think this really boils down to the common problem of
> ancient software shipped by RHEL and the bug-for-bug compatibility in
> CentOS with the list system eating its own dog food. That is, there
> is a fix for mailman, but not in the CentOS version. Sometimes
> stability is good, sometimes you need the updates.
can you file this at bugs.centos.org please
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
