Re: Not To James B. Byrne

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Darr247 <darr247@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12 November 2014 @20:50 zulu, g wrote:
>>
>> i believe problems are on your end, and not with server for James. i do
>> not see "dmarc=fail" or "p=QUARANTINE" in *any* of his email headers.
>
>
> I think you're not seeing the full headers, then.
>
> e.g. most of the headers of a recent message in here from James, and both
> those criteria appear about 5 lines down:
>
> Received-SPF: none (google.com: centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx does not designate
> permitted sender hosts) client-ip=72.26.200.203;
> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
>        spf=neutral (google.com: centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx does not designate
> permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx;
>        dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@;
>        dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=harte-lyne.ca

These are added by the receiving google server as a trace for how it
processed the spf/dkim/dmarc options.   They wouldn't be present on a
receiving system that ignores them - and probably wouldn't match that
format in any case.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
     lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux