On 11/11/2014 12:44 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Frank Cox <theatre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:12:58 -0600
Les Mikesell wrote:
I think that is a different scenario, though. Since the subnet
addresses are the same for both routers, the OP must only have one
NIC
Yes.
Can you tell where the packets are getting lost? Asymmetric routing
is supposed to work per the IP design, but Red Hat thinks they know
better and breaks it with their default settings:
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/53031
However, I thought that only applied to multiple NICs. Can you tell
if packets are coming in from the non-default router and the response
sent to the default one? And if so, can you traceroute to the
address where the connection attempt is originating?
Natting is obviously involved on this end and if the incoming ssh session is originating thru a nat
then if the response packet doesn't have as a source what the original destination was the
nat on the ssh end won't be able to figure where the packet should go.
--
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.*
Director of Technology
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.clark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.netwolves.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
