Reindl, you should relax a bit.
I didn't mean exactly "MX", just meant a "heads up" to take a look at
own configs.
I like how you defend using a broken http cert.
Regards
Alex
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Am 11.11.2014 um 19:34 schrieb Alexander Farber:
>>
>> Of couse I could "explain my Gmail mailbox not move messages" by James -
>> but I assumed the person sending 3-4 messages daily to this mailing list
>> might be asked to consider to fix his own settings (MX and http
>> certificate)
>
>
> you could also stop talking about things you don't have any clue - the MX
> has nothing to do with outgoing mail and SPF is as explained also not the
> reason
>
> it's the *list software* mangle DKIM signed messages
>
>> The Chrome warning for harte-lyne.ca looks dreadful by the way
>
>
> WTF - whatever certificate is used on a website has no business in context
> of mail and any software crying in context of mail because a self signed
> website certificate is broken
>
> complain at Chrome!
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
