On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Keith Keller
<kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2014-11-09, Stephen Harris <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 05:58:53PM -0800, Keith Keller wrote:
>>> The fundamental reason is because Mailman is rewriting the headers in an
>>> incompatible way. It is not his site's usage of DKIM. This is a known
>>> issue with Mailman. (I used to have a good link explaining the issue,
>>> but can't find it now; if I find it later I'll post it.)
>>
>> So we have a 20-year old piece of technology ("mailman") and a modern
>> proposal ("DKIM")... and somehow it's mailman's fault. Uh huh.
>
> Mailman is by my reckoning only about 15 years old, and DKIM has been
> around for about a decade. So I'm not really convinced by your argument
> here.
Isn't this a philosophical question about who the author really is?
That is, does it belong to the original sender or is is something
made up by the list that deserves to be signed as though they made it
up?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
