On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Nux! <nux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Do you also run the hypervisor? Because if you are not, then the host can dump your guest's memory and retrieve the luks passphrase from there AFAIK. Who are you hiding from? Beautiful, thanks for pointing that. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Q. LUKS or ecryptfs-utils ?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Q. LUKS or ecryptfs-utils ?
- From: Martin Cigorraga <martincigorraga@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 23:42:34 -0300
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1463348783.26620.1414018329512.JavaMail.zimbra@li.nux.ro>
- References:
- Q. LUKS or ecryptfs-utils ?
- From: James B. Byrne
- Re: Q. LUKS or ecryptfs-utils ?
- From: Nux!
- Q. LUKS or ecryptfs-utils ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Lenovo RD-340 E2420
- Next by Date: KDE C6.5+cr : heads-up screens renamed after update
- Previous by thread: Re: Q. LUKS or ecryptfs-utils ?
- Next by thread: Re: Q. LUKS or ecryptfs-utils ?
- Index(es):
 |