On 20 Oct 2014 12:41, "Boris Epstein" <borepstein@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> sshd is not a telnetd-type servide yet it uses a .socket file. So I
thought
> djbdns should as well.
>
It can be run that way as an option:
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/inetd.html
> As for why DJBDNS - we have used it for a long time due to the security
> advantages. And yes, BIND is now much better than it used to be and we may
> switch to it at some point but for now we are still trying to get DJBDNS
to
> work.
>
If you are using the 1.05 tar from the djb site this is a very bad idea -
see previous links for reasons.
> I am close - when I start it manually and when I use it locally. So all I
> need to do is figure out how to start it automatically as well as how to
> open the necessary ports in the firewall.
>
The correct answer here to ease your maintenance burden if you insist in
djbdns is to use the ndjbdns package in epel that has already been
mentioned.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
