redhat-lsb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



I've noticed that some systems don't have redhat-lsb or even
redhat-lsb-core installed and as a side effect, the ocsinventory agent
reports them as 'linux' instead of Centos with the release version.
Also, where it is installed and ocsinventory does pick up the name, it
doesn't include Centos (pre-7.x) in the 'all Linux' grouping because
the name is just CentOS and unlike 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux, or 'SUSE
Linux Enterprise Server' which include Linux in the name.

Anyway, a few questions:

 Is there some reason to omit redhat-lsb-core from any of the install groups?

 Why is there such a big list of dependencies?  (glibc-devel,
gdbm-devel, perl-CGI, etc., seem odd as 'standard requirements').

  Even more so for the full redhat-lsb package?  Why are things like
qt and ghostscript pulled in by dependencies?

-- 
  Les Mikesell
     lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux