Re: file system replication

[Leon Fauster <leonfauster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Am 09.10.2014 um 20:11 schrieb John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 10/9/2014 11:06 AM, Andrew Holway wrote:
>>> >Can anyone provide some insight for me?
>>> >
>> This would be a perfect use case for ZFS snapshot send and receive!
> 
> Its not perfect if you don't want to lose all database transactions, new files, and email between the last update and the point of hardware failure.
> 
> 
> drbd really is the best answer as its continuous in-order replication.


+1

in conjunction with pacemaker and corosync it would also 
switch over when some hardware issues appears. 


--
LF 

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos