On 09/25/2014 01:07 AM, Michael Schumacher wrote: > good morning, > >>>> You should 'yum update' as soon as possible to resolve this issue. > > I installed the update on C5 and C6 machines, but I do not see any > difference in the output of "bash --version". Is that the expected > behaviour? > > C5 returns > ---8<--- > GNU bash, version 3.2.25(1)-release (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) > Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > ---<8--- > > and C6 returns > > ---8<--- > GNU bash, version 4.1.2(1)-release (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) > Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > ---8<--- > > before and after the update! > > best regards > --- > Michael Schumacher > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > That is not the way to check if you have the update installed. That is the major upstream bash version on which the Red Hat version is based ... this will likely never change throughout the lifetime of each individual man branch of CentOS .. that is, CentOS-5 will likely always say 3.2.25(1)-release, CentOS-6 will likely always say 4.1.2(1)-release, etc. What you need to do to check the version is this: rpm -q bash the result should be (if you have the update): for c5: bash-3.2-33.el5.1 for c6: bash-4.1.2-15.el6_5.1 for c7: bash-4.2.45-5.el7_0.2 Note: Some people may have ARCH enabled in their RPM commands, so a .i386, .i686, .x86_64 might be on the end of the above output, so for c7, it might say: bash-4.2.45-5.el7_0.2.x86_64 Thanks, Johnny Hughes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
