Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:06 PM, <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm trying Centos7 and using systemD. I've noticed that interfaces name
>> does not have anymore eth0,eth1, ethN but a different name.
>>>
>>> What do you think about predictable network if name assigned by
>>> systemd?
>>
>> They're doing it as emx, where x=[1...], except where it wants old
>> Sun-style pxdx... which I hate. I can live with emx, if I have to.
>
> What hardware is that on? The only multi-NIC box I've installed so
> far is an HP with eno1 through eno4 plus ens2f0, ens2f1, ens3f0, and
> ens3f1. A similar remote box has eno1-eno4 plus ensf0 and ensf1.
> I'm assuming the nics there are installed in a different slot....
Dell PowerEdges, R-various (720, 420, etc), which have two or four
on-board NICs.
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
