On 2014-09-07 2:56 pm, Oliver Schad wrote:
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:48:36 -0700
John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9/7/2014 11:44 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
> And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM
https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits says 1GB minimum for
x86_64.
It doesn't matter what it says. What matters is to think about
ressources, even in a linux distro with long term support and
enterprise features.
Enterprise doesn't mean waste your money. And really, to double the
memory to install a machine - are you kidding me? They've never thought
about it and I really hate this attitude.
Best Regards
Oli
Oli...perhaps instead of taking out your anger and frustration on the
CentOS packagers, you might wish to vent at the Upstream...because, when
all is said and done, CentOS is a repackaged RHEL. Whatever the
requirements are for the upstream are the requirements for CentOS.
Whatever the installer looks for in RHEL is going to be the same thing
that the installer looks for in CentOS.
I will leave you with this minor piece of wisdome, which I've seen
repeated in this list many times: if you don't agree with the
requirements or feel that there's a bug in the installer, you are more
than welcome to file a bug report with the upstream.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
"It's always suicide-mission this, save-the-planet that. No one ever
just stops by to say 'hi' anymore." --Colonel Jack O'Neill, SG1
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
