Re: Random Disk I/O Tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hello,

Try to use fio - http://git.kernel.dk/?p=fio.git;a=summary

You may use my rpm - fio-2.0.10-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
<http://yum.aclub.net/pub/linux/centos/6/umask/x86_64/fio-2.0.10-1.el6.x86_64.rpm>
or rebuild this src.rpm fio-2.0.10-1.el6.src.rpm
<http://yum.aclub.net/pub/linux/centos/6/umask/SRPMS/fio-2.0.10-1.el6.src.rpm>
using
fresh sources.


On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Matt <matt.mailinglists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I have two openvz servers running Centos 6.x both with 32GB of RAM.
> One is an Intel Xeon E3-1230 quad core with two 4TB 7200 SATA drives
> in software RAID1.  The other is an old HP DL380 dual quad core with 8
> 750GB 2.5" SATA drives in hardware RAID6.  I want to figure out which
> one has better random I/O performance to host a busy container.  The
> DL380 currently has one failed drive in the RAID6 array until I get
> down to replace it, will that degrade performance?  Is there an easy
> way to test disk I/O?  On a plain Gigabyte file copy the software
> RAID1 box seems to be twice as fast.
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



-- 
GPG Key ID: 6EC5EB27
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux