I was running a
rpm -qa --qf "%{vendor} \t\t%{name}\n" |sort|grep -v CentOS
looking for packages from other vendors installed on a machine and noticed a curious sight:
Fujitsu Limited crash-trace-command
It appears I am not the only one who has crash-trace-command from Fujitsu Limited
https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=1081&start=0#p6688
That is a good thing right? :)
I was curious however to find it in my centos mirror, and apparently signed by the centos crew[2].
Would one of our gentle OS maintainers be kind enough to confirm this is just an extension of the issues in bug 5967[1]? (which I found near the end of my web search)
Looking a little deeper it appears that there are a couple of other packages (rome) with odd vendors in the 6.5 tree:
for i in centos/6/os/i386/Packages/*rpm; \
do rpm -q --qf "%{vendor} \t%{name}\n" -p $i; \
done |grep -v CentOS
Fujitsu Limited crash-trace-command
Red Hat, Inc. python-qpid-qmf
Red Hat, Inc. qpid-qmf
(none) rome
(none) rome-javadoc
Red Hat, Inc. ruby-qpid-qmf
[1] http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5967
[2]
$ rpm -qa gpg-pubkey\*
gpg-pubkey-c105b9de-4e0fd3a3
$ for i in centos/6/os/*/Packages/crash-trace-command-*; \
do echo $i;rpm -q --qf "%{vendor} \t%{name}\n" -p $i;done
centos/6/os/i386/Packages/crash-trace-command-1.0-4.el6.i686.rpm
Fujitsu Limited crash-trace-command
centos/6/os/x86_64/Packages/crash-trace-command-1.0-4.el6.x86_64.rpm
Fujitsu Limited crash-trace-command
##Note the lack of
##"warning: centos/6/os/i386/Packages/crash-trace-command-1.0-4.el6.i686.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA1 signature: NOKEY, key ID c105b9de"
## which I did get on a CentOS 5 machine doing the same check.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
