Just my opinion but rpmforge was great for CentOS 5 then epel was better for 6.....I haven't tested 7 enough to know yet.
Adam King
IT Systems Administrator
Skipton Girls High School
01756 707600
www.sghs.org.uk
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt" <matt.mailinglists@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, 14 August, 2014 5:08:33 PM
Subject: Re: Instaling LAMP on CentOS 7.x
So EPEL is preferred over rpmforge now days? In past to get clamav
and some other packages seemed like I had to use rpmforge.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Always Learning <centos@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 11:26 -0400, John Plemons wrote:
>
>> Here is a link to enable the epel repo
>>
>> http://www.tecmint.com/how-to-enable-epel-repository-for-rhel-centos-6-5/ (
>> It was updated to include CentOS 7 )
>
> This is probably a better link as it provides more choices, for example
>
> * EPEL 7 beta: x86_64, ppc64, sources
> * EPEL 6: i386, x86_64, ppc64, sources
> * EPEL 5: i386, x86_64, ppc, sources
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Paul.
> England, EU.
>
> Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office.
> Linux is the future. Micro$oft is the past.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
