On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Always Learning <centos@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Always Learning wrote: > >> > No one really wants to revert to Sendmail - do they ? > >> It worked fine for me for years - what do you have against it? > > Sendmail lacks the configurability of Exim. Maybe, if you refuse to use the milter interface introduced in 2001. Or the available programs that do the work for you. > I refuse connections when the HELO / EHLO does not resolve to the > sender's IP address, for example > > Sender's IP : 62.25.80.157 = mail1.bemta105.messagelabs.com > Host name : mail1.bemta105.messagelabs.com = 62.25.80.157 > HELO name : server-12.bemta-105.messagelabs.com = no IP address > Date : Tuesday, 11:04, 12 August 2014, (+01:00) There's not really a requirement for that. And a multi-homed host or one behind nat may not know what IP you think it has. > Sender's IP : 202.94.83.220 = 202-94-83-220.infra.usd.ac.id > Host name : 202-94-83-220.infra.usd.ac.id = 202.94.83.220 > HELO name : ASRI-PC = no IP address > Date : Wednesday, 06:16, 13 August 2014, (+01:00) > > I can restrict sending to some email addresses to white-listed senders. > > I can get rid of pests by rejecting with a bounce message 'the > recipient's mail box is full'. I think sendmail can do those natively - or more easily with milters. > I can run a basic mailing list, within Exim, without having to use > Mailman. But why would you? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos