Re: Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

[Always Learning <centos@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 10:25 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:

> the big thing with any of these new service managers (I'm more familiar 
> with Solaris SMF than systemd, but I believe it does the same thing), is 
> that it determines whether the service properly starts and tracks 
> service dependencies.    sysVinit style services could only be sequenced 
> (start all lower numbered services before starting this one) and it had 
> to wait for each service to start before going onto the next, while SMF 
> and presumably systemd will start multiple services in parallel as long 
> as they aren't dependent.    also, SMF at least detects when a service 
> fails/stops, and attempts to take corrective action per how that service 
> is configured


Thank you for the enlightening information.


-- 
Regards,

Paul.
England, EU.

   Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office.
   Linux is the future. Micro$oft is the past.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos