2014-07-14 21:33 GMT+02:00 Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jitse Klomp <jitseklomp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> >> I certainly don't want to run Fedora in production - and I don't want
> >> to do the backport for such a complicated piece of software myself.
> >>
> >
> > RH will *not* do a backport of 3.3 to RHEL 6.x.
> >
> > Alexander Bokovoy (from Red Hat) on the freeipa-users list (feb. 17):
> > "RHEL 6.x lacks many of the dependencies required for IPA 3.3. Newer
> > MIT Kerberos (with API and ABI change for KDC database driver and many
> > other changes required for trusts and two-factor authentication), newer
> > Dogtag which relies on several dozens of Java packages and newer tomcat,
> > systemd (we use socket activation and tmpfiles.d a lot), newer SSSD.
> > Kerberos ccache stored in the kernel space (KEYRING ccache type)
> > requires changes at kernel level which are also needed for kerberized
> > NFSv4 for trusts as AD users have large Kerebros tickets when they are
> > members of many groups and so on."
>
> Isn't that the sort of thing that 'software collections' are intended
> to provide? It would be encouraging to see something actually built
> on top of them.
True, but FreeIPA ≥ 3.2 depends on systemd. I don't think it's possible
to put that into SCL...
- Jitse
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
