On Jul 14, 2014, at 11:19 AM, Andrew Wyatt <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:19 AM, <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> William Woods wrote:
>>
>> Please stop top posting.
>>>
>>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>> William Woods wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning <centos@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Having been working with UNIX like systems since 1985
>>>>>>> my biggest complaint with systemd is it so intrusive, it wants to be
>>>>>>> everything which makes
>>>>>>> it vulnerable to bugs and exploits - umm.. like Windoze!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My $.02
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + $ 10.00 :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Because UNIX has never had a bug or exploit right ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well... we know that > 50% of the Web and 'Net runs on Linux and other
>>>> unices. Compare and contrast the number of Windows Server
>>>> vulnerabilities
>>>> that have been exploited to those of *Nix... and, for extra credit, how
>>>> fast they were admitted, and fixed.....
>>>>
>>
>>> Like OpenSSL ?
>>
>> I suggest you google with the following search criteria: "windows server"
>> exploits
>>
>> mark
>>
>
> Are you really trying to win the thread with "but omg windows!"? All
> software is swiss cheese, the only really secure software is turned off.
> Windows is no more or less secure than anything else out there.
>
> OpenSSL is sadly an excellent example of that.
I was going to bring up OpenSSL but…..yea that.
>
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
