On 07/03/2014 01:49 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Not specifically about those, but just in terms of compatibility
>>> between a fedora src rpm and the Centos environment. A lot of things
>>> have changed in libraries and rpm syntax between centos 6 and current
>>> fedora so you are fairly likely to have some problems rebuilding an
>>> unmodified src rpm. On the other hand you should still be able to
>>> find fedora 19 src rpms and that environment should be very similar to
>>> Centos 7. So the rpmbuild would be much more likely to 'just work' -
>>> with the result also being very likely to be compatible with what
>>> would land in EPEL if the maintainer decides to add it.
>>>
>> Ah, so taking the src from remlab.net might not successfully build.
>> Putting up a Centos 7 beta (I could redo rigel to C7) and getting the
>> F19 source, I should be more successful.
>
> You can try it on C6, but it may take some tweaking in the spec file.
>
>> So where is miredo for F19?
>> Not at:
>>
>> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/19/Fedora/source/SRPMS/m/
> Look under:
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/19/Everything/source/SRPMS/m/
>
> And you'll need to 'yum install rpm-build' if you don't have it, along
> with development tools.
>
> If you can find an archive with one that worked on fedora 13 it would
> have a better chance of rebuilding on Centos 6.
>
I see that https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/13/ is
empty...
And will at best find v 1.17 back then.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
