Top posting: Seems someone's already filed this as a bug. You can keep an eye on the progress via -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1042879 Similar bug impacting SSSD -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089090 On 05/30/2014 10:18 AM, Eugene Vilensky wrote: > Hello, > > With SCL and epel repositories enabled, some dependencies for the package > name 'nodejs' get satisfied with libs from SCL which are placed in paths > that are not part of my user's environment. Is there a method to make sure > that nodeJS from epel dependencies are only satisfied from epel? > > > For example, the http parser dependency gets satisfied by > nodejs010-http-parser-2.0-5.20121128gitcd01361.el6.centos.alt.x86_6 > > http-parser-2.0-4.20121128gitcd01361.el6.x86_64 : HTTP request/response > parser for C > Repo : epel > Matched from: > Filename : /usr/lib64/libhttp_parser.so.2 > Other : libhttp_parser.so.2()(64bit) > Filename : /usr/lib64/libhttp_parser.so.2.0 > > > > http-parser-2.0-4.20121128gitcd01361.el6.i686 : HTTP request/response > parser for C > Repo : epel > Matched from: > Other : libhttp_parser.so.2 > Filename : /usr/lib/libhttp_parser.so.2 > Filename : /usr/lib/libhttp_parser.so.2.0 > > > > nodejs010-http-parser-2.0-5.20121128gitcd01361.el6.centos.alt.x86_64 : HTTP > request/response parser for C > Repo : scl > Matched from: > Filename : /opt/rh/nodejs010/root/usr/lib64/libhttp_parser.so.2 > Filename : /opt/rh/nodejs010/root/usr/lib64/libhttp_parser.so.2.0 > Other : libhttp_parser.so.2()(64bit) > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos