Re: "new" computers and monitors

[m.roth@xxxxxxxxx]

Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 05/29/2014 10:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 05/29/2014 08:34 AM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>> I was under the impression that the OP actually doesn't want it visible
>>> to the world, isn't intending to browse or email via it, but that it was
>>> for *only* inside. IF that is the case, he'd have to go into the
router and
>>> tell it to assign it an internal IP, and to *not* NAT it.

>> WIthout some type of NATing (if you have an internal IP) it can not
>> touch the Internet .. makes reading email kind of hard :D
>> (I did not say direct NATing .. some type of NAT is how things have an
>> internal address and talk to things that have a real address somewhere
>> else)
>
> As driver and co-author of RFC1918, our intention was addresses for
<snip>
Yeah, well, my favorite RFC is 1149.... <g>

       mark

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos