On Sat, 17 May 2014, Eero Volotinen wrote: > How about glusterfs? I have tried glusterfs; the large file performance is reasonable, but the small file performance is too low to be useable. Steve _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Large file system idea
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Large file system idea
- From: Steve Thompson <smt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 14:49:23 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CABzZrXcsQ9kyhayw5g1z8+TOCBidHbhHBueMZ16rRq=CHSKnRg@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Alpine 2.11 (LRH 23 2013-08-11)
- References:
- Large file system idea
- From: Steve Thompson
- Re: Large file system idea
- From: SilverTip257
- Re: Large file system idea
- From: Steve Thompson
- Re: Large file system idea
- From: Eero Volotinen
- Large file system idea
- Prev by Date: Re: Large file system idea
- Next by Date: firefox-29.0-5.1.el6
- Previous by thread: Re: Large file system idea
- Next by thread: Re: Large file system idea
- Index(es):
 |