RDP and Quacamole

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, April 30, 2014 11:45, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 04/30/2014 11:18 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> But freenx/NX/x2go put the big picture back the way it belongs.
>
> For certain usess I agree with that; for others, not so much. Seamlessly
> pulling applications from an application server to the display server
> has its distinct advantages, particularly for certain expensive
> commercial applications.
>
>> If you've never used NX or x2go, try it.
> I've been using NX (both the commercial version and the free version)
> for remote telescope control use for over five years, acting as a proxy
> for Windows RDP.  Works fine.
>

Does anyone here have any experience with Quacamole client-Less RDP?  If so,
what are your observations respecting it?

http://guac-dev.org/


-- 
***          E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel          ***
James B. Byrne                mailto:ByrneJB@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Harte & Lyne Limited          http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive              vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario             fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux