On 04/15/2014 05:17 AM, Christian Freund wrote: > Now calculating the hardware cost: 60K EUR for servers, storage-upgrade and > licenses, and saving 262MWh or 52K EUR per year. So after 14 month of > operation the energy-saving pays the hardware. In your case it was a big win. For us, not so much. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS
- From: Lamar Owen <lowen@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 11:23:34 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <feb9df24ccb746b5b956ffd3afffe8b2@mail1.intern.wrz.de>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
- References:
- Re: Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS
- From: mark
- Re: Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS
- From: Christian Freund
- Re: Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS
- Prev by Date: Re: Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS
- Next by Date: Contributing packages
- Previous by thread: Re: Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS
- Next by thread: Re: Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS
- Index(es):
 |