On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 11:28 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/11/2014 11:21 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > > On 03/20/2014 12:04 PM, Steve Clark wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Anybody else run into problems with biosdevname .0.5..0-2 changing names > >> from p2p1 to em1 when upgrading from biosdevname 0.4.1-3? > >> > >> Darn! > >> I thought biosdevname was to keep the names the same!! > >> > >> > > Update - I filed a bug report and got this response: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078974 > > > > Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: > > > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Status|NEW |CLOSED > > CC| |fdeutsch@xxxxxxxxxx > > Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE > > Last Closed| |2014-04-11 08:51:05 > > > > > > > > --- Comment #2 from Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > > > > > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1058170 *** > > > > Which is OK, but when I try to view the bug 1058170 I get > > > I guess I can't send an image - but it said: > *You are not authorized to access bug 1058170.* > even if I am logged into bugzilla. > > > > even after logging in. What up with that!!! > > > > > > I can view the report without issue via link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058170 The only comment i.e. #1 says: Fabian Deutsch 2014-01-27 02:13:59 EST Cloned this to biosdevname because it the device names changed between 6.4 and 6.5. Regards Phil -- Phil Wyett { GNU Linux User and Developer Leigh GNU Linux User Group (http://leigh.lug.org.uk) IRC: philwyett Twitter: philwyett and leigh_lug }
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
