Re: chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 04/07/2014 06:37 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
> Is this legit? Anyone try this build?
>

It is legit in that it seems possible to build via the DevTool Set 1.0
... and also DevTool Sets 2.0/2.1.:

http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools-2/

There are custom patches in the source code that I have not completely
validated and I have also not looked at the flash handling completely in
the sources.

I do plan to look at this code a bit more and make it build in mock and
not manually out of the chroot ... so I can not currently vouch for it
100%, but it does seem on first blush to be legit.

I do plan on doing some work with this after I get back home from
ApacheCon (Denver, Colorado - 7 to 11 April 2014) and Red Hat Summit
(San Francisco, CA - 13 to 18 April 2014) ... so likely in 2 weeks.  Of
course, if I have some free time at those places then I might get it
done sooner.

If someone out there wants to validate the source code in the meantime,
feel free to do so and post here.

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux