> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hersh Parikh [mailto:hershparikh12@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 7:05 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: GLIBC_2.7 not found
>
> Sure. Will do so.
>
> Thanks!! :)
>
>
>
> On Friday, 28 March 2014 4:18 PM, Tru Huynh <tru@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 02:33:05AM -0700, Hersh Parikh wrote:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > Thanks for your valuable suggestion. I will keep them in mind. I have
> > checked whether there is a way to update to Centos to 5.10 without
> > damaging the cluster suite and I was suggested the best way is to
> > reinstall the entire cluster suite. There are few suggestions around
> ...
> Next time, just say that your are using Rocks which is managing your
> CentOS distribution and not a plain CentOS-5 setup ;)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tru
>
if you MUST have the cluster accessible by the internet, or even much of the institution's intranet, definitely consider options for keeping it up to date. Or at least it's accessible nodes.
I noticed when I looked at rocks[1] a while back, that there are folks in that community which have been _looking_ at how to safely do some updates:
https://wiki.rocksclusters.org/wiki/index.php/Software_Update_%28SUWG%29
Note that it looks like they have not updated the page in a while, so I would use on a test cluster and do a small compute job that is in line with what your institution often does first. And of course see if that group could be reinvigorated. :)
Oh, and no I don't run a rocks myself, but had looked into one around the time of the formation of the above group.
[1] http://www.rocksclusters.org/wordpress/
Even when this disclaimer is not here:
I am not a contracting officer. I do not have authority to make or modify the terms of any contract.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
