> Not optional? You mean I won't be able to ip a s xxxx dev xxxx, etc? > > What is you have only a serial console? > Well, it's recommended but not required like firewalld also? it requires some cli commands to disable both and return to traditional way? -- Eero _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Is there any benefit to using NetworkManager on a server with a static IP?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Is there any benefit to using NetworkManager on a server with a static IP?
- From: Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 02:12:57 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <5332e712.e508980a.41c3.2806SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
- References:
- Is there any benefit to using NetworkManager on a server with a static IP?
- From: Christopher Jacoby
- Re: Is there any benefit to using NetworkManager on a server with a static IP?
- From: Lamar Owen
- Is there any benefit to using NetworkManager on a server with a static IP?
- Prev by Date: Re: NVidia, again
- Next by Date: vncserver does not start gnome-sessioin automatically
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there any benefit to using NetworkManager on a server with a static IP?
- Next by thread: Re: Is there any benefit to using NetworkManager on a server with a static IP?
- Index(es):
 |