Re: CentOS 5 + Quagga + SELinux

[Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> All in the world, or all that have been created for currently installed
>> packages?   Is this as bad as rpm packaging where any two different sources
>> are likely to conflict in name and/or contents?
>>
> Well we have not had this problem over the years, since most people upstream
> their policy.  Right now if a customer installed a policy file which
> conflicted with the base policy, it will get overwritten.  I guess if they did
> it will rpm then it would get you an RPM error/warning.

What does 'upstream' mean in the context of packages that aren't
included in RHEL base or EPEL?  It just seems like a giant list of
global variables without any structure or namespace management.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
     lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos