If this is software you are attempting to compile, then maybe it would be
best to fix it... post the compilation/linker error...
Cheers,
MaZe.
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Sam Drinkard wrote:
> Unfortunately, No. The current version of the x86-64 does not have, and I
> can't install the glibc-2.3.3 libs to run the software, and I'm pretty sure
> the i386 version would be the same, however I was hoping someone could tell
> me. There should be some backwards compatibility, but apparently there is a
> specific call in the 2.3.3 lib that is not available in the 2.3.4.
>
> William Warren wrote:
>
>> You can't drop back to the 32-bit version of CenttOS 4?
>>
>> Sam Drinkard wrote:
>>
>>> List,
>>>
>>> It looks like I may have to drop back to a 32-bit version of the OS due
>>> to some non-resolvable library issues for the software I'm attempting to
>>> compile, and want to ask, how far back can I go with CentOS where I'd not
>>> lose too much functionality of the 4.1 version. Essentially what I need
>>> is the equivalent of RHES 3. The other thing I'd thought about would be
>>> to install the needed gnu library, but in a non-standard place, like
>>> /home/sam or some other user directory. Since the software only needs
>>> this at runtime and not during linking, I don't see what It would bother.
>>> Given that idea, how would I use RPM to install that library ? I read the
>>> man page, but did not seen much option for installing to a non-std
>>> location, and not have the system actually "recognize" it as being there.
>>>
>>> suggestions?
>>>
>>
>
>
