Re: [OT] Video card radiator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, g wrote:

> On 02/11/2014 12:34 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> <> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014, g wrote:

>> Now that I look again, that appears to be the case.
>> Not only that, the radiator is tilted so that
>> only the right front corner is close to the board.
>
> (BWG)
>
> i notice that also.
>
>> That area of the board is empty except for a UPC sticker.
>
> who said we who engineer do not know how to think? ;-)

Not I.

> you would be very surprised at just how much time is spent
> in trying to "tear down" a new system design. heat sinking
> is an on going challenge.

No, I wouldn't.

What surprises me is that its current mechanical
arrangement corresponds to its orignal design.
To me, the radiator seemed to have fallen down.
For all I knew, it might have been held up by persuasion.

-- 
Michael   hennebry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"SCSI is NOT magic. There are *fundamental technical
reasons* why it is necessary to sacrifice a young
goat to your SCSI chain now and then."   --   John Woods
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux