centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx schrieb am 28.01.2014 14:56:53:
> Von: Sorin Srbu <Sorin.Srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> An: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Datum: 28.01.2014 14:57
> Betreff: Re: NIS or not?
> Gesendet von: centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf Of Logan McNaughton
> > Sent: den 28 januari 2014 14:33
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > Subject: Re: NIS or not?
> >
> > Where I work we use NIS + Kerberos (Active Directory). We have about
150
> > machines at our site. It works quite well, as someone said, the big
draw
> > back to NIS is that it sends passwords insecurely, but if you use
Kerberos
> > for authentication it's really quite easy to manage.
>
> We do have Active Directory as well, but only for the Windows clients.
>
> But I'd rather keep them separated.
>
> Kerberos on linux. Is that a pain or a bigger pain?
> Whenever I've worked with Kerberos on Windows I've come out all sweaty
> afterwards... 8-S
>
> --
> //Sorin
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi Sorin,
we're using ldap with kerberos connected to Active Directoy on our squid
proxy with success. And a few Linux-Admins are working (with their Windows
User name and Password) with Kerberos connected to Active Directoy on
their workstations.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Andreas Reschke
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
