On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 16:38 +0100, Ulrik S. Kofod wrote: > great! now I got all annoyed for nothing ;) Don't worry, that's not a rare occurrence here. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://centos.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051130/29944dcd/attachment.bin
why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- From: ivazquez at ivazquez.net (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams)
- Date: Wed Nov 30 15:44:02 2005
- In-reply-to: <42007.195.212.29.92.1133365114.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <0E1AFE473A23CA4F9F571D55B5F8BC39B3A62A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <438DC1AF.4050805@xxxxxxxxx> <42007.195.212.29.92.1133365114.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- From: Nielsen, Steve
- why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- From: Karanbir Singh
- why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- From: Ulrik S. Kofod
- why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Prev by Date: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Next by Date: CentOS mailserver and spam filter setup ideas & preferences
- Previous by thread: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Next by thread: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Index(es):
 |