On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Warren Young <warren@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Sigh..., It's complicated. I want stability and reliable security >> updates. But I don't like being dependent on any single entity to >> provide that. > > You want your Linux to be under control, but not controlled. Is that it? :) Controlled as in having a currently authoritative version, but not secret or restricted beyond not calling something different the same name. > Someone has to have their hand on the tiller. Yes, but if the boat sinks it would be nice if the blueprints didn't go down with the ship. (Or even if it goes off in a wildly wrong direction...). Anyway, per Johnny's comment that it is all going to be published - that's all anyone could ask. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos