On 01/17/2014 05:03 PM, IonPacepa wrote: > "Every one of "you", unhappy ones, could have created your own rebuild," > > A lot of Redhat rebuild projects gave up their very existence to support a > single CentOS. > > Not giving up the secret sauce is about control and power in the hand of a > few that have now financially benefited and retain a dictatorship on > roadmaps, release information and code. > Path to CentOS core member is simple. You join CentOS Q&A team, and after some time proving you are reliable, you might join them. Unless you prove your self, you can not even get job of supervisor to a bunch of clerks in supermarket, right? It is dangerous to allow unproven persons messing with such trusted OS like CentOS. > Community here is a consumer of a built OS, but there is no community in how > it gets built. And with this centralized power comes the takeover and > payouts. > > If Redhat wasnt trying to block OEL or SL or trying to control CentOS and > make it different, they would simply offer RHEL for free on their own. This > allows them to wean the world off of CentOS at what is likely to be a > glacial pace at first then by Redhat we will have all given up. > So you just skipped everything else I said and just reiterated what you said in first e-mail? Ok, what ever, I am done wasting time on you. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos