From: Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@xxxxxxxxx> > That sounds worrying. Could you elaborate, or provide a citation? Remember this? http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2013/12/09/serious-security-google-finds-fake-but-trusted-ssl-certificates-for-its-domains-made-in-france/ The whole SSL certificates system is not to be trusted if (some of) the guys who manage it are corrupt. JD _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?
- From: John Doe <jdmls@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:41:19 -0800 (PST)
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <slrnld00hg.tlg.liam.p.otoole@dipsy.tubbynet>
- References:
- Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?
- From: James B. Byrne
- Re: Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?
- From: Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
- Re: Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?
- From: John R Pierce
- Re: Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?
- From: Robert Moskowitz
- Re: Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?
- From: Liam O'Toole
- Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?
- Prev by Date: Re: apache - upload files bigger than 2Go
- Next by Date: libapreq2
- Previous by thread: Re: Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?
- Next by thread: Re: Can we trust RedHat encryption tools?
- Index(es):
 |