Re: Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?

Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> · Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:37:16 -0600

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I always just assumed that blowfish was good precisely because it
>> wasn't the one that was recommended/promoted by the groups likely to
>> be compromised.   But, I try to stay out of politics so I don't worry
>> much about keeping secrets anyway.
>
> Bruce's twofish was better; it was his AES submission.

But didn't that come later?  With nothing else to go on, that would
make me think that it is more likely to have been influenced by
whatever means corrupted the others.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos