Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 03.01.2014 15:37, Leon Fauster wrote:
>
>> Am 03.01.2014 um 15:04 schrieb Ken Smith<kens@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>> Leon Fauster wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am 03.01.2014 um 08:57 schrieb Mauricio Tavares<raubvogel@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Leon Fauster
>>>>> <leonfauster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> {snip}
>>>> thats why i suggest to try it in backup. Thats not a solution, it is more
>>>> a heuristic way to get close to the problem (after evaluating the results).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I tried it in /media. Same result. Its as if umount is doing a rm -rf
>>>
>>
>> please try /backup, /test or /random or something that is not /mnt or /media.
>> The latter dirs are common to be under control by some "processes".
>>
> Also try to use /bin/umount instead of just umount. That way you prevent
> a potential alias for "umount" from running instead of the actual command.
>
> Regards,
> Dennis
>
>
>
OK result. I created /TEST and mounted and umounted successfully with
both /bin/umount and plain umount
Interesting, as suspected something is messing with things in /mnt and
/media
Ken
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
