RHEL Load Balancer Add-on vs KeepAlived

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hello,

I've started reviewing HA solution for HAProxy and trying to decide between
RHEL HA Add-on and KeeAlived. Just curious if anyone had a chance to use
any of these technologies in a production environment? I would love to
learn what your experience with these technologies is in terms of
management, scaling, troubleshooting, and monitoring.

I am leaning towards RHEL Add-on at the moment because a better
documentation, simpler architecture, set-up and management. This project
also appears to me to be more active compared to KeepAlived, but I might be
wrong.

Thanks,

Dimitar
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux