Re: ZFS on Linux testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Chuck Munro <chuckm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Not presumptuous at all!  I have not heard of backupbuddy (or dirvish),
> so I should investigate.  Your description makes it sound somewhat like
> OS-X Time Machine, which I like a lot.  I did try backuppc but it got a
> bit complex to manage IMHO.

I've always considered backuppc to be one of those rare things that
you set up once and it takes care of itself for years.  If you have
problems with it, someone on the backuppc mail list might be able to
help.   It does tend to be slower than native rsync and especially bad
at handling huge directories, but sometimes you can split up large
filesystems into smaller subdirectory runs and if necessary you can
use the ClientAlias feature to make it look like a single large host
is several different systems so you can skew the full and incremental
runs of different areas to different days.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
     lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux