How much GB RAM RHEL 7 64bit support ?
Công Nghệ VPS - LEVU BIS Co., Ltd
Website : <a href="http://congnghevps.net";>http://congnghevps.net</a>
Email : info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone : 055.3.842.159
Yahoo : levubis
XEN VPS, Cloud VPS, Dedicated Server, Game Server
> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 22:21:27 +1300
> From: peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: RHEL 7 Beta is now public
>
> On 12/15/2013 09:40 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> > On 12/14/2013 8:55 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> >> Nobody wants old desktop apps.
> >
> > new apps tend to have heavier memory and performance requirements.
> >
> > we don't run 16 bit stuff anymore either, and 16 bit computers, like
> > intel 286, are LONG obsolete, outside of the low end embedded market.
>
> That's a bit different, Linux never had 16 bit support, but is still
> perfectly usable on a 32 bit arch. I understand RedHat dropping 32 bit
> support for this release, the needs of RedHat customers are different to
> those of CentOS users, when you fork out a few grand for a server
> license it's not such a big deal to get a new server to go with it.
>
> That said, it may not be very difficult to build the sources for i386,
> and I personally don't see any reason why CentOS can't or shouldn't.
> The 32 bit arch will be in a separate repo to the 64 bit, so won't
> interfere with upstream compatibility, and CentOS likely already has the
> infra in place to do a 32 bit build from prior versions. Since Fedora
> still fully supports 32 bit, right up to rawhide it's reasonable to
> assume that the RedHat sources should build to 32 bit without too much fuss.
>
>
> Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
