John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 03:26:45PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>> You mean a venue that chooses to use the specific service being
>> discussed with the specific results being discussed? Hmmm...
>
> It stopped being that quite some time back. Like the last time this
> occured. Or the time before that. If there are issues like this that
> need to be addressed there is an established address that one should be
> using: $listname-owner@xxxxxxxx - it will get routed to the person that
> is the ultimate owner of the list; said list is available by looking at
> the bottom of the listinfo web page:
>
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> Arguing about this type of subject on the list doesn't do anything to
> address the problem, if there is one to be addressed.
I keep hoping, perhaps foolishly, that others who get hit with this will
add their voice, and that the list might go to using some other source to
block spam.
mrak
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
