....unlikely.. not ...likely...
Cheers,
Cliff
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Cliff Pratt <enkiduonthenet@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Wow! RH9 was discontinued in 2004! It is likely that a machine from that
> era has the ability to run CentOS 6.4 both in terms of resources and the
> availability of drivers.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Cliff
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Mark LaPierre <marklapier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hey Y'all,
>>
>> Does anyone know where I can look, please post a URL, where I can find
>> out what the minimum system requirements are for CentOS 6.4?
>>
>> I've searched the CentOS.org web site for this but I've come up empty.
>> I've got an old machine that had RH9 on it. The HD died so I had to
>> replace that. Now I'm thinking that I want to install CentOS 6.4 on it
>> but the minimal install disk says that I don't have enough RAM for it to
>> do the install.
>> --
>> _
>> °v°
>> /(_)\
>> ^ ^ Mark LaPierre
>> Registered Linux user No #267004
>> https://linuxcounter.net/
>> ****
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
