Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:32 AM, <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Sorin Srbu <Sorin.Srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> Can e.g. BackupPC handle several file systems to backup to?
>>>> I.e. comp1 through 10 should backup to /bak1, comp 11 through 20 to
>>>> /bak2 and so on.
>>>
>>> The main point of backuppc is that it hard-links all files with
>>> identical content to save space, so it needs to put everything on one
>>> filesystem. However, I'm getting pretty good performance running it
>> <snip>
>> *shrug*
>> So does rsync - we use hard links a *lot*, to keep 4-5 weeks of full
>> nightly backups for a lot of servers.
>
> No, rsync will only hardlink to instances of the same file in the same
> location from previous runs. Backuppc will link every file with
True. But we have a directory structure like
.../servername
|-> date1
date2
> identical contents even from different machines and locations. And it
> compresses them. So you could probably keep 2 to 10x the history
> online compared to anything else. Plus it has a nice web interface.
>
> --
> Les Mikesell
> lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
